Fallacy Face-off

Worksheet Description

This worksheet invites students to compare and contrast non sequiturs with other types of logical fallacies. It focuses on distinguishing non sequiturs from three specific fallacies – Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, Faulty Analogy, and Ignoratio Elenchi (irrelevant conclusion). For each pair, students are prompted to write explanations that clarify the differences between the non sequitur and the other fallacy. This exercise requires critical thinking and a clear understanding of subtle differences in flawed reasoning.

“Fallacy Face-off” aims to deepen students’ understanding of logical fallacies by honing their ability to discern between various types of flawed reasoning. It teaches the nuanced differences that characterize each fallacy, going beyond a superficial understanding to foster analytical skills in evaluating arguments. This worksheet is particularly valuable in teaching students to not only identify fallacies but also to articulate why a particular reasoning is fallacious. Developing this skill is important for academic excellence and for navigating everyday arguments and debates with a critical eye.